Thanks for your feedback, Christoph. The “100%” is accurate because there’s no data released in Daylight that hasn't previously passed through the OSM.org <http://osm.org/> database. When we observe errors and fix them manually, we make our edits to OpenStreetMap like any other editor.
I’m not sure I fully understand your second question, hopefully you can elaborate! -mike. ---------------------------------------------------------------- michal migurski- contact info and pgp key: sf/ca http://mike.teczno.com/contact.html > On Mar 10, 2020, at 3:44 AM, Christoph Hormann <o...@imagico.de> wrote: > > On Tuesday 10 March 2020, Michal Migurski wrote: >> >> • A PBF planet file composed of 100% OSM data, released under the >> terms of the Open Database License. • Only those edits which have >> been validated to contain no malicious vandalism or unintentional >> errors so we can show them in our display maps > > Could someone maybe do an analysis of the diff regarding numbers of > features removed/changed/added for various types of objects? > > Regarding > >> • A PBF planet file composed of 100% OSM data > > that is probably an incorrect characterization because any time you > modify OSM data without uploading the results to OSM what you get is no > more 100% OSM data. > > Thinking this further - the real question is if there is other data used > in production of the maps using this that constitutes a derivative > database according to the ODbL or in other words: Does Facebook claim > that this is the only derivative database they are using? > > -- > Christoph Hormann > http://www.imagico.de/ > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
