But then you're often talking about a HOT mapper who might not have done
any mapping for three years.
I must confess when validating HOT projects if I saw a mapper had done
something glaringly wrong and it was more than a week before noting the
response rate to a changeset message was less than 1% I may have simply
corrected the work.
I haven't been on the ground in Africa but I suspect the number of
villages a kilometre apart connected by a one kilometre motorway is not
high. If have I reclassified someone's private motorway I apologise.
I think we have talked around the subject enough and it should be left
to the local mappers to decide what to do.
Thanks John
Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote on 2020-03-12 7:17 PM:
Mar 12, 2020, 23:54 by dieterdre...@gmail.com:
sent from a phone
On 12. Mar 2020, at 17:42, Marc M. <marc_marc_...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
we may delete all fixme=name for all object without a name tag
I agree that fixme=name for missing names is pointless and could
be removed (although Andy has a point about not knowing someone’s
workflow, so for safety you could spare those added in the past
1-3 months). If there are other questions concerning the name it
would obviously have been better if they had been more explicit
about these potential problems in the fixme tag, but still, if
someone has added a fixme=name on an object with a name we should
keep it.
Though unspecific fixme=name is not very useful, I would ask in
changeset that added this
what exactly is wrong/suspicious if I would encounter it during editing.
And yes, fixme=name on object without name is likely completely useless.
But I would also consider asking people adding it whatever it is used
in any way.
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
--
Sent from Postbox <https://www.postbox-inc.com>
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
