I was thinking of a, b, c,... as different use cases of attribution.
Le 2 mai 2020 17:35:47 GMT+02:00, Mario Frasca <ma...@anche.no> a écrit : >On 02/05/2020 09:54, Yves wrote: >> IMHO, a a/b/c/d kind of vote like for the last Article of Association >change would be preferable to really have a more representative idea of >the contributor feelings. Could the OSMF set up such a process? > >only related to the voting method, what method is used currently? when > >you offer more than two options, and you want to choose one, there's >criteria to consider, and "first past the post" is a bad strategy. > >if you like reading things in latin, there's the original literature >/Ars notandi/, /Ars eleccionis/, and /Alia ars eleccionis/ by >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramon_Llull/ >/ > >I think this is a very clear example: >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condorcet_method#Example:_Voting_on_the_location_of_Tennessee's_capital > >and otherwise a more detailed description here: > >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schulze_method (this is used by Debian).
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk