i did not write the e-mail program, but it looks like your talking about (reply all) not (reply). >Saturday, June 13, 2020 2:28 PM -05:00 from Dave F via talk ><talk@openstreetmap.org>: > >Could you please reply to the forum list not just the sender. I assume you're >the OP. Difficult to tell when you use different email addresses. > >>then why is the picture on top of the bridge when bridge is added. > >You appear to be confusing the ID editor with actual renderings of the map. >How it appears i iD when in edit mode is irrelevant. We map & tag so renderers >can produce detailed maps. > > >On 06/06/2020 01:57, John D. wrote: >>tunnel looks better than bridge, water is still visible under the layer of >>bridge, or area, does not hide water. >> >>tunnel hides water. >> >>>Friday, June 5, 2020 8:43 AM -05:00 from Dave F via talk >>><talk@openstreetmap.org> : >>> >>>On 05/06/2020 13:45, 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> when the river stream comes to the bridge can you split and add tunnel ? >>>There can't be both a tunnel and bridge. It's one or the other. This >>>goes for all scenarios, including roads. >>> >>>DaveF >>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>talk mailing list >>>talk@openstreetmap.org >>>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >> >> >> >> >_______________________________________________ >talk mailing list >talk@openstreetmap.org >https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
