ok !
>Saturday, June 13, 2020 5:19 PM -05:00 from John D. <j...@mail.ru>: > >OK ! > > >>Saturday, June 13, 2020 4:24 PM -05:00 from Mateusz Konieczny via talk < >>talk@openstreetmap.org >: >> >>Though if valid tagging results in poor results, then it still can be reported >>https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD (check whatever it is already reported >>before making a new issue) >> >>Jun 6, 2020, 12:28 by talk@openstreetmap.org: >>>>then why is the picture on top of the bridge when bridge is added. >>> >>>You appear to be confusing the ID editor with actual renderings of the map. >>>How it appears i iD when in edit mode is irrelevant. We map & tag so >>>renderers can produce detailed maps. >>> >>> >>> >>>On 06/06/2020 01:57, John D. wrote: >>>>tunnel looks better than bridge, water is still visible under the layer of >>>>bridge, or area, does not hide water. >>>> >>>>tunnel hides water. >>>> >>>>>Friday, June 5, 2020 8:43 AM -05:00 from Dave F via talk >>>>><talk@openstreetmap.org> : >>>>> >>>>>On 05/06/2020 13:45, 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> when the river stream comes to the bridge can you split and add tunnel ? >>>>> >>>>>There can't be both a tunnel and bridge. It's one or the other. This >>>>>goes for all scenarios, including roads. >>>>> >>>>>DaveF >>>>> >>>>>_______________________________________________ >>>>>talk mailing list >>>>>talk@openstreetmap.org >>>>>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>talk mailing list >>talk@openstreetmap.org >>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > > > >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
