Incredibly enough surfaces also change, no doubt many of our gravel tracks were correct at the time and have now been paved or bound.
19. júlí 2020 kl. 20:33, skrifaði "Martin Koppenhoefer" <dieterdre...@gmail.com>: > sent from a phone > >> On 19. Jul 2020, at 14:48, Hauke Stieler <m...@hauke-stieler.de> wrote: >> >> Blind reverts are also pretty bad. In my case, I talked to other people >> in our community and only reverted some of the edits, which are very >> unplausible (like "grade4" with "surface=paved" and imagery showing a >> paved way). > > I also just today corrected some roads which all had the highway=track tag > with surface=gravel and > track type grade2 or 1, but actually some were paved narrow > residential/unclassified roads in the > country side, with speed limits (30), reflectors and guard rails in parts, > some were signposted > private driveways, and some houses, farmyards and b&bs, some were actually > tracks. It’s hard to > tell from the imagery (that there are houses is obviously visible, but the > difference between > gravel and asphalt may be hard to tell), and it was misleading for me, until > I came there and > understood that the information in the area in OpenStreetMap was unreliable > (looked like detailed > tagging but then half of these details were fictional). > > Cheers Martin > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
