The example from Marc_marc tells us keeping underground things hidden is bad https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghislenghien_disaster
As for underwater, in the 1990s and early 2000s Iceland kept getting disconnected from the rest of the Internet by fishing ships trawling the CANTAT-3 branch, which for the early parts was the only connection to the Internet for the whole country. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CANTAT-3 19. janúar 2023 kl. 12:57, skrifaði "Niels Elgaard Larsen" <elga...@agol.dk>: > john whelan: > >> Apparently you can do a lot of expensive damage by firing a rifle bullet >> through them > as happened >> more than once in the US and given the situation in Europe at the moment > >> is there a risk that >> something similar could happen there? >> Should we have a process that says some things should not be mapped? >> I seem to recall that the location of the pipeline that supplies aviation >> fuel to > airports is >> considered an official secret in the UK. > > Transformers and powerlines are not official secrets. And they can be spotted > by anyone passing by > and be seen on aerial images. > > It does make more sense to keep objects underground or underwater secret. > > We do have https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1098580572 > > But I do not know if it is precise enough for a submarine with a bomb. > And there are official maps with the layout, e.g., > https://www.mynewsdesk.com/dk/energistyrelsen/documents/kort-over-nord-stream-2-linjefoering-paa-dan > k-omraade-68552 > > -- Niels Elgaard Larsen > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
