Makes sense. 

> On Sep 26, 2015, at 3:17 AM, go...@erg.abdn.ac.uk wrote:
> 
> We seem to have two documents in a space where we started with one. These
> are different, to me this is OK. Both seem close to charter milestone 1. I
> don't see much overlap between the contents of the descriptive language
> and the API-focussed analysis, and any overlap could be eliminated.
> 
> To me, doc 1 (current chartered item) can evolve to provide background and
> missing documentation for anyone in the IETF, and should compare 
> transports in a broad way and draw out the idea that they provide
> services. This appears to be harder to get right than I for one had hoped,
> and still has a wide scope. Not a bad thing. I suggest it will provide a
> reference to stop us rat-holing when people ask what is "this" and explain
> how all these transports stack-up against one another (good pun?). We can
> (I suggest) finish this doc in this way.
> 
> I do like the idea of a second document focussed ONLY on the Transport API
> (I'd call this 1a). In this we can avoid this"discussion of what are
> transports"  and move to  a  more focussed  process in doc 1b,  Most of
> that troublesome descriptive  text can go into 1, and ensure we keep that
> one readable to anyone in the  IETF.
> 
> Could  I suggest the two docs against the first milestone will help us
> make  progress towards the next milestone faster. (Assuming we can keep
> the two aligned, which seems quite doable). I can see also how the  docs
> are useful to different people. I'd like to see both mature and provide
> inputs to move forward.
> 
> Gorry
> 
> 
>> Interesting and inline to getting transport API(s)
>> 
>> Marie-José Montpetit
>> ma...@mjmontpetit.com
>> mari...@mit.edu
>> 
>>> On Sep 21, 2015, at 04:44, Michael Welzl <mich...@ifi.uio.no> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Dear all,
>>> 
>>> In my presentation in Prague, I proposed an approach to identify the
>>> services that transport protocols provide. At the end of the ensuing
>>> discussion, I said that I (with co-authors) would write a draft that
>>> explains the proposal by applying the proposed method to TCP and SCTP.
>>> 
>>> We just submitted this document - see below;  I hope that this will lead
>>> to some discussion on the list...
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Michael
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>> 
>>>> From: <internet-dra...@ietf.org>
>>>> Subject: New Version Notification for
>>>> draft-welzl-taps-transports-00.txt
>>>> Date: 21 Sep 2015 10:35:33 CEST
>>>> To: Michael Welzl <mich...@ifi.uio.no>, Michael Welzl
>>>> <mich...@ifi.uio.no>, Michael Tuexen <tue...@fh-muenster.de>, Naeem
>>>> Khademi <nae...@ifi.uio.no>, Michael Tuexen <tue...@fh-muenster.de>,
>>>> Naeem Khademi <nae...@ifi.uio.no>
>>>> Resent-From: <mich...@ifi.uio.no>
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> A new version of I-D, draft-welzl-taps-transports-00.txt
>>>> has been successfully submitted by Michael Welzl and posted to the
>>>> IETF repository.
>>>> 
>>>> Name:        draft-welzl-taps-transports
>>>> Revision:    00
>>>> Title:        An Approach to Identify Services Provided by IETF
>>>> Transport Protocols and Congestion Control Mechanisms
>>>> Document date:    2015-09-21
>>>> Group:        Individual Submission
>>>> Pages:        23
>>>> URL:
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-welzl-taps-transports-00.txt
>>>> Status:
>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-welzl-taps-transports/
>>>> Htmlized:
>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-welzl-taps-transports-00
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Abstract:
>>>> This document describes a method to identify services in transport
>>>> protocols and congestion control mechanisms.  It shows the approach
>>>> using TCP and SCTP (base protocol) as examples.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>>>> submission
>>>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>>> 
>>>> The IETF Secretariat
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Taps mailing list
>>> Taps@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Taps mailing list
>> Taps@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
>> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
Taps@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps

Reply via email to