+1

> On 26. sep. 2015, at 13.28, Marie-Jose Montpetit <ma...@mjmontpetit.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> Makes sense. 
> 
>> On Sep 26, 2015, at 3:17 AM, go...@erg.abdn.ac.uk wrote:
>> 
>> We seem to have two documents in a space where we started with one. These
>> are different, to me this is OK. Both seem close to charter milestone 1. I
>> don't see much overlap between the contents of the descriptive language
>> and the API-focussed analysis, and any overlap could be eliminated.
>> 
>> To me, doc 1 (current chartered item) can evolve to provide background and
>> missing documentation for anyone in the IETF, and should compare 
>> transports in a broad way and draw out the idea that they provide
>> services. This appears to be harder to get right than I for one had hoped,
>> and still has a wide scope. Not a bad thing. I suggest it will provide a
>> reference to stop us rat-holing when people ask what is "this" and explain
>> how all these transports stack-up against one another (good pun?). We can
>> (I suggest) finish this doc in this way.
>> 
>> I do like the idea of a second document focussed ONLY on the Transport API
>> (I'd call this 1a). In this we can avoid this"discussion of what are
>> transports"  and move to  a  more focussed  process in doc 1b,  Most of
>> that troublesome descriptive  text can go into 1, and ensure we keep that
>> one readable to anyone in the  IETF.
>> 
>> Could  I suggest the two docs against the first milestone will help us
>> make  progress towards the next milestone faster. (Assuming we can keep
>> the two aligned, which seems quite doable). I can see also how the  docs
>> are useful to different people. I'd like to see both mature and provide
>> inputs to move forward.
>> 
>> Gorry
>> 
>> 
>>> Interesting and inline to getting transport API(s)
>>> 
>>> Marie-José Montpetit
>>> ma...@mjmontpetit.com
>>> mari...@mit.edu
>>> 
>>>> On Sep 21, 2015, at 04:44, Michael Welzl <mich...@ifi.uio.no> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Dear all,
>>>> 
>>>> In my presentation in Prague, I proposed an approach to identify the
>>>> services that transport protocols provide. At the end of the ensuing
>>>> discussion, I said that I (with co-authors) would write a draft that
>>>> explains the proposal by applying the proposed method to TCP and SCTP.
>>>> 
>>>> We just submitted this document - see below;  I hope that this will lead
>>>> to some discussion on the list...
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Michael
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>> 
>>>>> From: <internet-dra...@ietf.org>
>>>>> Subject: New Version Notification for
>>>>> draft-welzl-taps-transports-00.txt
>>>>> Date: 21 Sep 2015 10:35:33 CEST
>>>>> To: Michael Welzl <mich...@ifi.uio.no>, Michael Welzl
>>>>> <mich...@ifi.uio.no>, Michael Tuexen <tue...@fh-muenster.de>, Naeem
>>>>> Khademi <nae...@ifi.uio.no>, Michael Tuexen <tue...@fh-muenster.de>,
>>>>> Naeem Khademi <nae...@ifi.uio.no>
>>>>> Resent-From: <mich...@ifi.uio.no>
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> A new version of I-D, draft-welzl-taps-transports-00.txt
>>>>> has been successfully submitted by Michael Welzl and posted to the
>>>>> IETF repository.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Name:        draft-welzl-taps-transports
>>>>> Revision:    00
>>>>> Title:        An Approach to Identify Services Provided by IETF
>>>>> Transport Protocols and Congestion Control Mechanisms
>>>>> Document date:    2015-09-21
>>>>> Group:        Individual Submission
>>>>> Pages:        23
>>>>> URL:
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-welzl-taps-transports-00.txt
>>>>> Status:
>>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-welzl-taps-transports/
>>>>> Htmlized:
>>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-welzl-taps-transports-00
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Abstract:
>>>>> This document describes a method to identify services in transport
>>>>> protocols and congestion control mechanisms.  It shows the approach
>>>>> using TCP and SCTP (base protocol) as examples.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>>>>> submission
>>>>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The IETF Secretariat
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Taps mailing list
>>>> Taps@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Taps mailing list
>>> Taps@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
>>> 
>> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
Taps@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps

Reply via email to