I support using at least part of the time to triage and discuss the open issues (thanks to Michael for filing all of those!!).
I’m happy to make some slides about implementation/deployment thoughts, but would welcome others who do implementations to also provide input. Best, Tommy > On May 8, 2023, at 1:10 PM, Michael Welzl <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Not related to presentations, BUT: we also have some work to do: > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/ijkQhWRrGkWfS-cxx_2ylPrEEGA/ > and: > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/bpBk8QxZMLksr3ZuROtf2_BXYdI/ > > (any others that require work? Have I missed anything?) > > What do you think, should we also do our usual thing and use some interim > time to discuss issues and PRs where we address these reviews? This of > course would need people to get active before that… me, I’ll try to get > started! I wanted to start filing issues to begin addressing the latter > review at least a week ago, but I’m lagging behind. > > Cheers, > Michael > > >> On May 8, 2023, at 3:54 PM, Reese Enghardt <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Dear TAPS, >> >> This is a quick and friendly reminder that our interim meeting is coming up >> in a week. >> >> So far, we have not received any indication of interest to present. Please >> let the chairs know if you do want to present anything related to the agenda >> items below. >> >> Looking forward to seeing you next week! >> >> Best, >> Reese >> >> >> On 4/17/23 12:17, IESG Secretary wrote: >>> The Transport Services (taps) WG will hold a virtual interim meeting on >>> 2023-05-15 from 08:00 to 10:00 America/Los_Angeles (15:00 to 17:00 UTC). >>> >>> Agenda: >>> Preliminary agenda: >>> >>> - Implementation update >>> - What can we do now to foster deployment of TAPS? >>> - Discoverability/configuration >>> - Mappings: QUIC, HTTP, any others? >>> >>> Please let the chairs know if you'd like to present on any of these. If >>> nobody presents, we'll have a free-form discussion. >>> >>> As mentioned in the original thread, the chairs are wondering if it'll be >>> time to conclude TAPS once the core documents have made their way to the >>> RFC editor, unless we see evidence of substantial interest and activity >>> regarding further milestones. This includes editorial activity. >>> >>> >>> Information about remote participation: >>> https://meetings.conf.meetecho.com/interim/?short=10057741-d86c-47d5-a46e-5bebe9cda598 >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> A calendar subscription for all taps meetings is available at >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/upcoming.ics?show=taps >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Taps mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Taps mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps > > _______________________________________________ > Taps mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
_______________________________________________ Taps mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
