Hi, I second this plan.
We should also talk briefly whether we want to have a WG meeting at IETF117 to carry status and beginning chartering discussion into a broader audience. > On 10. May 2023, at 22:55, Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple....@dmarc.ietf.org> > wrote: > > I support using at least part of the time to triage and discuss the open > issues (thanks to Michael for filing all of those!!). > > I’m happy to make some slides about implementation/deployment thoughts, but > would welcome others who do implementations to also provide input. > > Best, > Tommy > >> On May 8, 2023, at 1:10 PM, Michael Welzl <mich...@ifi.uio.no> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Not related to presentations, BUT: we also have some work to do: >> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/ijkQhWRrGkWfS-cxx_2ylPrEEGA/ >> and: >> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/bpBk8QxZMLksr3ZuROtf2_BXYdI/ >> >> (any others that require work? Have I missed anything?) >> >> What do you think, should we also do our usual thing and use some interim >> time to discuss issues and PRs where we address these reviews? This of >> course would need people to get active before that… me, I’ll try to get >> started! I wanted to start filing issues to begin addressing the latter >> review at least a week ago, but I’m lagging behind. >> >> Cheers, >> Michael >> >> >>> On May 8, 2023, at 3:54 PM, Reese Enghardt <i...@tenghardt.net >>> <mailto:i...@tenghardt.net>> wrote: >>> >>> Dear TAPS, >>> >>> This is a quick and friendly reminder that our interim meeting is coming up >>> in a week. >>> >>> So far, we have not received any indication of interest to present. Please >>> let the chairs know if you do want to present anything related to the >>> agenda items below. >>> >>> Looking forward to seeing you next week! >>> >>> Best, >>> Reese >>> >>> >>> On 4/17/23 12:17, IESG Secretary wrote: >>>> The Transport Services (taps) WG will hold a virtual interim meeting on >>>> 2023-05-15 from 08:00 to 10:00 America/Los_Angeles (15:00 to 17:00 UTC). >>>> >>>> Agenda: >>>> Preliminary agenda: >>>> >>>> - Implementation update >>>> - What can we do now to foster deployment of TAPS? >>>> - Discoverability/configuration >>>> - Mappings: QUIC, HTTP, any others? >>>> >>>> Please let the chairs know if you'd like to present on any of these. If >>>> nobody presents, we'll have a free-form discussion. >>>> >>>> As mentioned in the original thread, the chairs are wondering if it'll be >>>> time to conclude TAPS once the core documents have made their way to the >>>> RFC editor, unless we see evidence of substantial interest and activity >>>> regarding further milestones. This includes editorial activity. >>>> >>>> >>>> Information about remote participation: >>>> https://meetings.conf.meetecho.com/interim/?short=10057741-d86c-47d5-a46e-5bebe9cda598 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> A calendar subscription for all taps meetings is available at >>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/upcoming.ics?show=taps >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Taps mailing list >>>> Taps@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Taps mailing list >>> Taps@ietf.org <mailto:Taps@ietf.org> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Taps mailing list >> Taps@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps > > _______________________________________________ > Taps mailing list > Taps@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
_______________________________________________ Taps mailing list Taps@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
