Hi Frank,

-- Message from Frank Niessink  (27.12.2009 16:14)
>  
>
> 2009/12/26 Michael Jaeger <[email protected]
> <mailto:michael.jaeger%40in-flux.de>>:
> > I understand this subtasking thing, but I do not see the use in having a
> > note on an attachment to a note to an attachment ;-).
>
> Well, me neither. But no one is forcing you to use it like that :-)
>
That is true, but from my experience, some people will use that feature
and then you might get problems in displaying the structure in a
sensible way (e.g. in reports).  Apart from that I believe that this
feature is not necessary.  I strongly recommend to follow the KISS
principle (Keep It Simple and Stupid).  Do only integrate features which
are really needed, otherwise you will sometimes run into serious
compatibility problems.

> Suppose attachments couldn't have notes, would that remove your
> concern about the over-engineering?
>
I would strongly vote for removing this feature, yes.

All the best,
Michael.

Reply via email to