Hello all, Sunday, May 8, 2011, Arjan de Groot wrote: > Some examples of code left untouched:
> - Numbered Re in follow-up Subject lines. Like Re[1]:, Re[2]: etc. > This is Beta! specific, non RFC behaviour. It breaks threading-by- > subject in other mail clients. It's just as awful as the erroneously > translated Av: Antw: subject prefixes of some old Outlook Express > versions. RFC can not contain anything what any developer implements and there is no reason to remove feature which exists 10 years, BTW it is turned off by default. > - Initialized quote prefixes, like: AdG>> quoted text. > This is a non RFC compliant method of quoting and is not recognized by > other mail clients. again this is configurable by macro, so user can decide when use this feature. > - Message-ID url's. TB! uses <mid:localpart@server>, which is useless > in other mail clients. false, it is not used in headers. And if other clients does not support it, this is reason to remove it from TB? Why?? > It's these and other "features" like mugshots and betamoticons that > lead me to believe that Beta! developers and chronical beta! list > habituals alike are living in a world of their own and are impervious > and hostile towards input from outside. Like I said before: it just > behaves like some kind of sect. You should comment something You understand and know about, somebody could call You stupid. As I see, You are here to create flames only, You should use another list instead. Thank You -- Bye Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat! http://www.thebat.cz Using the best The Bat! 5.0.12.1 under Windows 7 6.1 Build 7601 Service Pack 1 with MyMacros,XMP,AnotherMacros, AntispamSniper v 3.2.6.4 Notebook Thinkpad, Core2 Duo 2.40 GHz, 4 GB RAM ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 5.0.12.1 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
