At Sunday, May 20, 2001, 12:27:39 AM, A stitched together the following:
M>> It would reduce the "possible confusion factor" a lot, while preventing
M>> stupid users from setting a filter to act on both flagged AND unflagged
M>> messages at the same time and wondering, what in the world went wrong
M>> :)
> Is that really an issue in this case?
YES IT IS! :) I had a friend of mine complaining that his filters are not
working, and - voila! - he had a test for messages BOTH "older" AND
"newer" than a certain number of days. Of course his response was "Ooops?
I have no idea how THIS got in here!" :>
M>> Or maybe you'll respond to the mail of mine, in which I offered to write a
M>> whole new script-based mail filtering engine for you at no cost?? ^_^
> That's a testy remark to make publicly. :-/
Huh? I thought I had sent this email I'm talking about to the list -
didn't I?? @_@
--
<-- don't tell me I forgot to add a tagline again
|\ /| \~~~/ \~~~/ WWW: http://maxxx.ii.com.pl (ancient)
| \/ | /\ > < \~/ > < E-M: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (no spam please)
|____| /__\ /___\ /_\ /___\ ICQ: 3146019 (currently inactive)
Flyin' high with The Bat! v1.53 Beta/6
over the swamps of Windows NT 5.0 build 2195
--
______________________________________________________
Archives : <http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com>
Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
