Hello Jonathan, Wednesday, December 10, 2003, 9:13:58 AM, you wrote:
>> Mulberry does not have this bug. TB does <g> You can have a standard >> display, or have "containers" for just your Favorite mailboxes/dirs, or >> just subscribed dirs, or any other name you want for a container... J> Ahhh virtual folders... Understood... I've seen other clients that J> feature things like that too. Exactly... but called containers, (any name for them you wish), holding your favorite mailboxes, or any group of mailboxes you wish. Does not have to be subscribed to physically see these mailboxes. >> With TB, you have to be subscribed to see a dir/mailbox. Not so with >> Mulberry.. J> That doesn't necessarily make it a bug, that just makes it a different J> way of handling unsubscribed folders. I agree 100%, poor choice of words. J> It's okay, I know exactly what it is now ;) Evolution has something J> similar to it. Yes, I have used Evolution also..., but not much. >>> however because it's unsub'd, Mulberry might be having issues with >>> it. Is the "container" selectable? >> The issue is with TB, not being able to look at a folder unless it is >> subscribed. J> This technically isn't a bug though, as there are no specifications in J> the RFC that says a client MUST be able to display an unsubscribed J> folder. Agreed, the RFC is nebulous enough <g> J> That's just an enhancement in the client. An interesting one, that's J> for sure. Not used it much in Evolution. Have not played much in Evolution, other than to set it up. J> I tried to create one that emulated the virtual ticker in TB, but it J> killed my PC trying to read all the folders ;) Now that is an interesting idea.. -- Best regards, Gary ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 2.02 CE RC2 | "Using TBBETA" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
