Hi Allie and list, On Sunday, September 5, 2004 at 10:22:07 GMT -0500 (which was 17:22 where I live) Allie Martin wrote (at least in parts) and made these valuable points on the subject of "NFS: Big question for 9Val":
> I've been reading this thread and am a convert this POV. Though the > purity of MAU's proposed system is nice, it does seem to potentially > create limitations. I now agree with the view that actions should be > able to be applied to messages after they've been moved, however, not > after they've been deleted. Neither should actions be applied to > copies created and placed in another folder. I could agree with your POV - just need a clarification for a point i cannot understand: What are several "MOVE"s in a row supposed to do: move _one_ and only one message, or create several copies of the original message? (Not considering if that is useful). I stumbled over this one, because during testing the subfilters there was a point, where each SF acted as if "continue with other filters" was marked, so several moves (one for each SF) were carried out and I ended up with several copies of the messages. (That bug is gone by now, luckily.) -- Regards Michael powered by The BAT! 3.0.0, Useless Macro Collection 1.8.845 beta, and MyMacros 1.11 with usual problems of Windows XP Pro 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.00.06 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
