In reply to <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :

TB> Hello David,

TB>   A reminder of what David Calvarese on TBBETA typed on:
TB>   25 February 2005 at 19:39:29 GMT +0100

DC>> Someone  on this list called Pocomail a 'child's toy', but it's a
DC>> child's  toy  that  has basic functionality that TB! is currently
DC>> lacking

TB> And  the reason TB is lacking it is because it's taken us years of
TB> campaigning to keep it that way.

No comments!

TB> I don't see why your so adamant to get full html support. You keep
TB> comparing  TB  to  all  these other email clients, if they're that
TB> good and do what you want then use one of them.

Because  you're  not  alone in the world and definitely TB! is NOT the
only email client and text mode is NOT the only mode to send emails.


TB> Incredimail  does  html  pretty well, it's crap at everything else
TB> but it'll do what your asking.

That's  not the point, is it? Why must others have a lame html support
just to satisfy a few ones?

Is  it too much to have an option to enable full HTML support? Is your
opinion  so  well  supported  to  be imposed to the wide majority that
doesn't  subscribe  the  beta  list  but would really like to have the
full HTML suport?


-- 
Best regards,
Goncalo Farias

Word Perfect Support can't be beat!


________________________________________________________
 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Reply via email to