> Vili wrote: >>> you have the exact same reasons with your 'usb-enclosed' HDD. >>> ...maybe even worse, given that write-back for USB flashdrives isn't >>> quite as optimistic as with HDDs (including those 'usb-enclosed'). >> :)) I dont know this stuff, all I am seeing is that with a USB stick, >> it takes time to load Voyager, while with a USB HDD it is FAST to load >> and MUSH FASTER to work with. When I say, Unplug USB drive, 1 second, >> Safe to remove... > if you "optimize" the stick "for performance", you get almost the same, > with maybe a bit of difference in the speed of the device itself. > apparently, you don't follow a constructive discussion: first, you say > sticks and "optimize for performance" is bad because of eventual data > loss in case of power outage. then you continue with arguing that > write-back flushing takes only one second after the "unplug" request. it > seems like arguing for the sake of arguing, which i'm not quite eager to > follow, sorry.
I wrote a long answer. But I deleted it. Why? I dont want to argue. I used stick with optimized for performance and use my HDD. Huge difference. I DID try it. You didnt. End of story for me. -- Vili ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.99.06 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
