Saturday, October 23, 1999, 5:28:45 AM, Ali wrote:
> That's very true. ICQ is very bloated now, providing you with all
> sorts of fandangles that are unnecessary because the functionality is
Geez, I had completely forgotten about it. The only reason I upgraded to
ICQ99a was so I could have message lengths over 450 characters. I'd love to
see some of the 'nix people port their versions to Windows. I'd be perfectly
happy with licq or micq (if micq would fix a major bug, that is).
>> W: nothing (would be, uhm, XNews, I think)
> ^^^^^
> That's a good one though it's an online
> newsreader. Not much offline reading
> functionality built in.
The one I was looking at used SLRN style score files (a requirement) and
did have nice offline capability. So most likely, if you're right, it wasn't
XNews. It also was free.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, click below and send the generated message.
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
