Sunday, December 12, 1999
Hello Thomas,
Sunday, Sunday, December 12, 1999, you wrote:
Thomas> Hallo Paula,
Thomas> On Sunday, December 12, 1999, 9:21:50 AM (GMT+0800), Paula Ford wrote:
PF>> On Saturday, December 11, 1999, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > 2. Implement the possibility to define new templates based on
>>>> > the existing ones, please!
>>>>
>>>> I don't think I understand this one...
>>> Wow, Paula, that was clearly a typo on my part. Actually I ment
>>> "macroses".
PF>> Ah, OK. Yes, that would be cool. To me, the macros are misnamed anyway.
PF>> They are more 'variables' that can be used in templates. Macro usually
PF>> refers to a bit of user-defined scripting, at least in all the software
PF>> I've ever used. What you are asking for is more along the lines of
PF>> having some scripting or macroing capability, which would indeed be
PF>> nice. At a minimum, I wouldn't think it would too hard to allow users
PF>> to define their own variables.
Thomas> I thinnk it would be a good idea if we could define some additional
Thomas> variables. (I prefer that term over "macroes" as well.) :-)
Agreed
Best regards,
tracer
Using theBAT 1.38e
SPECIALISTS in datarecovery/virus removal/hard disk recovery / Computer repairs /
sales / Maintenance contracts / System backups
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
website : Under construction
phone: 271194
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
