FW>> So -that's- not the answer.
> Well nuts... *sigh*
Yeah, although I said something a little stronger. <g>
FW>> (I wish it were that simple.)
> Hmmmm... now that I think about it, some time ago someone was asking about people not
> having so much info in their Replies... or something to that effect. And someone ELSE
> mentioned that using a -- in the template would "erase" everything below those
>hash
> marks.
I've got the <dash><dash><space> in other templates and it works with no
problem. Such as the reply template I'm using right now.
FWIW, I've tried the template in question without the separator, and of
course it did the same thing.
> I don't know if anyone else remembers the exact nature of that discussion, but maybe
>it
> applies here? Or at least something along those lines( no pun intended :P hehe )
> Anyone ?????
Yes.
Anyone out there with some help on this??????
--
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's
too dark to read.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.phred.net/~phred
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
