On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 06:45:00 +0100, Jast wrote:
> True, but it's hard for software itself to do so. Sure, you can
> make it super-customizable, but that will always mean work for the
> user to customize it. If you get to learn a new software with new
> paradigms, you should try to get get to know it better, it may give
> you new insights and show you more effective ways to work.
Agreed. When I met TB!'s editor, my reaction was 'hmmm, interesting'
instead of, 'See here .... but what crap is this editor up to. Why does it
have to do it this way?'. It's one thing for an app to implement a
different approach as opposed to an app having a bug or a frank
shortcoming or inability to do a certain task. TB!'s approach with some
things are different. It is indeed a breath of fresh air to get to try
something different and that something different is available on the
market. I can therefore understand when some get upset when others leave
all those apps out there that's working the standard way and start pushing
for making TB! function as the rest of the apps out there. Where's the
variety then?
--
-=Allie=- | Using The Bat! v1.39
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Windows NT4.0 (Service Pack 6)
--------------------------†---------------------------------
[ Originality is the art of concealing your sources. ]
____
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
