Leif wrote:
NA>> It would have been far less confusing to name the full install
NA>> tb1.41.exe for instance, and the executable could then retain the
NA>> name thebat.exe I don't know about the others, but I found them to
NA>> be confusing, listed as they were.
LG> I once asked RITLabs why they insisted on keeping the the_bat.exe
LG> filename across different versions, and they said it was so that no
LG> matter what review you read, and no matter how old it was, you would
LG> always be pointed to the most current version of TB.
Ahh, the joy of symlinks, all they need to do is link to the most
recent version if you select the_bat.exe, or you can note that there
are different versions if you see tb139.exe, tb141b4.exe, and
tb141.exe.
-tom!
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
