Hi there!
On 8 Apr 00, at 18:05, Michael Heydekamp wrote
about "Re: Using Macros for header (%RETUR":
> >> I'll bet the Return-Path: in your example has been added by _your_
> >> SMTP server, NOT by TB. The reason might be the will of your sysadmin
> >> to ensure that the automated replies (like mailing lists traffic
> >> after you subscribe) goes to gmx address, NOT your send-address.
BTW, this was written by me and tested on 1.41. After that I installed 1.42,
and, to my surprise, 1.42 is indeed adding the Return-Path: header.
> DH> No, it _was_ generated by TB. I did try it with TB and Outlook.
> DH> Outlook did it as intended. But anyway, the issue is already fixed
> DH> in the next beta.
>
> Sure? I just downloaded v1.42 Beta/12 and TB is still and as before
> setting the Return-Path to the address specified in the Reply-To header
> (if any).
No idea. IMHO, TB should _not_ set the Return-Path: itself. It's up to SMTP
server to set/unset/change this field, and TB is _not_ a SMTP server.
--
SY, Alex
(St.Petersburg, Russia)
http://mph.phys.spbu.ru/~akiselev
---
Thought for the day:
The sad thing about Windows bashing is it's all true.
---
PGP public keys on keyservers:
0xA2194BF9 (RSA); 0x214135A2 (DH/DSS)
fingerprints:
F222 4AEF EC9F 5FA6 7515 910A 2429 9CB1 (RSA)
A677 81C9 48CF 16D1 B589 9D33 E7D5 675F 2141 35A2 (DH/DSS)
---
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
