Monday, April 24, 2000, 9:47:41 AM, Allie wrote:
> The level of macro and template functionality at the folder and address
> book level. Folder specific settings where purging is concerned. The
> filtering capabilities are what I'm talking about. Yes, other mailers that
> I have used offer these but not in such a wholesome, thorough package.

    And yet I find TB! extremely lacking in many areas; just like I find
others lacking in many areas.  To put it bluntly, TB! isn't doing anything
that wasn't standard on a BBS when I was a teenager.

> But you have to have the last word. Ok, Mutt makes TB! pale in comparison
> where automation is concerned. Hurah! Wonderful. :-)

    Point was also to highlight the one part that people /WILL/ use on a
consistent basis.  TB! is one of only two email clients that handles multiple
accounts in a sane manner.  Even a power user like me pushing close to 1k
messages a day through TB! only has two dozen filters, a whole *2* folders
with automated deletion and maybe 1 alternative template which is needed.  I
have 2 others which are fluff and nothing more.  I find them useful, yes, but
I could switch back to PMMail tomorrow if they released a version with IMAP
and not miss them.  OTOH, IMAP in a package that doesn't handle multiple
accounts properly is useless to me.

    I don't get the notion that the cutsey fluff features mean poo in a one
line summery.  If they did you'd all lose anyway because we can't skin TB!.

-- 
         Steve C. Lamb         | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
         ICQ: 5107343          | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org


Reply via email to