At 12:44 AM 9/2/2001 +0700, you wrote: >> Nope, while autoforward Mdaemon will keep return-path header intact. >> Next Monday, I can ask Marck to check his Mdaemon logs. > >Well, not to mention the fact that return-path header has already >changed by MDaemon. As I could remember, we have met this kind of >problem, right? :-) Yupe. At that time we have no Mdaemon logs, nor Qmail logs, and netzero involved. This case we will have Mdaemon logs, hope this will clarify more better. -- _syafril_ [ attachment or non text part has been remove by MDaemon ]
- Re: failure notice ?? Thomas F
- Re: failure notice ?? Allie C Martin
- Re: failure notice ?? flash
- Re: failure notice ?? Thomas F
- Re: failure notice ?? Allie C Martin
- Re: failure notice ?? Marck D Pearlstone
- Re: failure notice ?? flash
- Re: failure notice ?? Allie C Martin
- Re: failure notice ?? Syafril Hermansyah
- Re: failure notice ?? flash
- Re: failure notice ?? Syafril Hermansyah
- Re: failure notice ?? flash
- Re: failure notice ?? Syafril Hermansyah
- Re: failure notice ?? Marck D Pearlstone
- Re[2]: failure notice ?? Jernej Simončič
- Re: failure notice ?? Thomas F
- Re: failure notice ?? Syafril Hermansyah
- Re[2]: failure notice ?? David Elliott
- Re: failure notice ?? Januk Aggarwal
- Re: failure notice ?? Syafril Hermansyah
- Re: failure notice ?? Rob