Hello all, I know this may be SOT but, anyway, here it goes.
The fact that I am one of those that, more or less seriously or joking, every now and then "complains" about the use of PGP signatures in this list, does not mean that I don't understand the usefulness and even need of PGP or S/MIME signatures. And here is where my questions comes. I am considering using PGP or S/MIME for some business correspondence (obviously with TB) and, perhaps because I have not read enough about either, it is not clear to me what are the advantages and disadvantages of one or the other. Just looking at this list I see that, of those of you who use it, most use PGP and just a few S/MIME digital signatures. Why is this so?. From what I have seen/read and tested (and read about the problems some of you have to get an specific version of PGP running with TB) it seems to me that S/MIME is much easier to use both for the sender and the recipient(s). Am I missing something here? Any quick and brief explanation/opinion will be appreciated. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.60c ________________________________________________________ Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
