Hallo Mike, On Fri, 26 Jul 2002 15:31:47 -0700GMT (27-7-02, 0:31 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote:
MD> How would I eliminate the "References" header in my mail threads? MD> I have no desire to sort by thread and I'm getting complaints from MD> my paranoid IT friends. Without third party tools you can't remove them. As far as your paranoid IT friends are concerned, point them to rfc2822, that says the following about the references header: 3.6.4. Identification fields Though optional, every message SHOULD have a "Message-ID:" field. Furthermore, reply messages SHOULD have "In-Reply-To:" and "References:" fields as appropriate, as described below. The "Message-ID:" field contains a single unique message identifier. The "References:" and "In-Reply-To:" field each contain one or more unique message identifiers, optionally separated by CFWS. somewhat further on it continues: The "In-Reply-To:" and "References:" fields are used when creating a reply to a message. They hold the message identifier of the original message and the message identifiers of other messages (for example, in the case of a reply to a message which was itself a reply). The "In-Reply-To:" field may be used to identify the message (or messages) to which the new message is a reply, while the "References:" field may be used to identify a "thread" of conversation. This ought to satisfy them. -- Groetjes, Roelof ________________________________________________________ Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/