Sunday, August 11, 2002, 3:38:36 PM, you wrote: >> Come on Thomas, you have to be a bit more open minded. >> He's not asking to make it bigger, just re-sizeable. >> You could keep it as small as you wanted for yourself. DAC> It is not the size which I find lacking, but the lack DAC> of ability to search. Yes to both! Lynn -- 1.60q on Win2kPro SP2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * * Aun Aprendo I'd rather be WARP'ed * * * Team OS/2 ________________________________________________________ Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
- Re: "Sorting Office" St - Musaic.Net
- Re: "Sorting Office" Allie C Martin
- Re[2]: "Sorting Office&q... Michael Thompson
- Re[2]: "Sorting Offi... Michael Thompson
- Re[3]: "Sorting... Pete Milne
- Re: Re[3]: "Sor... Jonathan Angliss
- Re: "Sorting Of... Peter Palmreuther
- Re: "Sorting Office" Urban Ek
- Re: "Sorting Office" Miguel A. Urech
- Re: "Sorting Office" Dwight A Corrin
- Re: "Sorting Office" Lynn Turriff
- Re: "Sorting Office" Thomas F.
- Re: "Sorting Office" Miguel A. Urech
- Re: "Sorting Office"... Thomas F.
- Re: "Sorting Office" Clemens 'Gullevek' Schwaighofer
- OT: Double Negative (was: &qu... Thomas F.
- Re: OT: Double Negative (... Lynn Turriff
- Re: OT: Double Negative (... Miguel A. Urech