On Mon, 2002-08-12 at 21:27, Thomas F. wrote: > > MT> Caught this thread on spamassassin. The Bat will thankfully NOT be > MT> labeled as "ratware". > > How professional are these people? How much power (in which ever way) > do they have?
If he has anything to do with spamassasin, or any number of its filters, it could have a little bit of an impact depending on the general usage of the program. I was considering implementing it recently, but decided against it, and stuck with my procmail filters. > Luckily, because two people on the same list know people who use TB > and are not spammers, TB was not labeled "ratware". Wow. I am awed by > their scientific approach. Indeed, otherwise it'd share the same fate as those shared by a certain ISP that decided to lock out TB! because of miss-information. > Sorry, but if these guys have anything to say in ISPs, the internet is > doomed. I believe some small-time ISPs have implemented spamassasin, but it is mainly home users IIRC. -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ________________________________________________________ Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
