Hello Carsten Thönges, On Fri, 22 Nov 2002 14:07:02 +0100 GMT your local time, which was Friday, November 22, 2002, 8:07:02 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Carsten Thönges wrote: > * Thomas Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Simon wrote: >>> In a recent discussion with a friend I was _told_ ;) that 'Re:' used in the >>> subject line of an email was an abbreviation for 'Reply' >> >>> Anyhow, after thinking about it, I can understand that using Re: in a *new >>> message* to mean 'Regarding' may be confounding to the recipient of it as it >>> may be mistaken to mean a 'Reply', but I am still uncertain whether there is >>> an actual proper or accepted usage of 'Re:' in email messages. >> >> "Re:" stands for Reply. > No. As the RFC says it means "res". it stands as far as I know for 'reference'... -- Best regards, tracer Using theBAT 1.60q mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] C.C.S. Associates FAX (USA): (208) 460-3753 pgp 6.5.3 : 0x909D9B10 ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
