-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, February 05, 2003, Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) wrote...
>>> To: postmaster@[80\.80\.100\.216] >>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ JA>> I had noticed that it did this, but I just sent myself two emails JA>> just fine, one via a postfix SMTP server, and one via a sendmail JA>> SMTP server. Once each over telnet, and via TB!, all 4 arrived > ^^^^^^^^^^^^ JA>> intact. > Hmmm... it's interesting. Maybe your recent tries were successful > because you're using an 1.63 Beta/5 version of the TB!. Mine was > 1.62e and is 1.62i now. It could be that they fixed it... I cannot see anything in the beta files that mentions it, so it could have silently been fixed. So you are possibly quite correct. JA>> The question is, what was the error message you got back from JA>> your undelivered email to the literal address? Did you even get JA>> one? > Yes, here it is: > ---[Cut]--- > ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- > <postmaster@[80\.80\.100\.216]> [..] > The server is running Sendmail 8.12.6 under FreeBSD 4.7-Release. - From a guess, TB! seems to want to put in the \ for some reason. Not sure why they'd do it, but they do... That clearly is killing the sending of the mail. Now... here is something odd... I just tested again with Sendmail, and managed to break it, it appeared to have added the \, but a retest on postfix found it worked just fine. So either postfix is stripping the \ in the [ ] or some oddities are going on somewhere between. As for how I got it to work with Sendmail the first time is something completely different. - -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQA/AwUBPkGTWCuD6BT4/R9zEQIThgCghclb4IY5MRNtRO5gHh5bftbgAyEAnjSg KTnaSPOX06DDNJkpzSwljgrd =YdgF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
