Hello,

Friday, June 13, 2003, 6:49:12 PM, you wrote:

MA> <snip>

>> The filtering system you presented, if I remember correctly, rejects
>> all HTML email out of hand.  This seems kinda draconian to me.  I'll
>> bet a lot of those rejections are false positives.  POPFile actually
>> reads the HTML and can correctly distinguish spam-HTML from
>> non-spam-HTML.

MA> To this author, e-mail is text; HTML belongs on the web; HTML in
MA> e-mail is spam.

No, it is not. There's no need to be paranoid about e-mails.

MA> Read my lips: Not a thing draconian about that logic.

Your rules are way too serious in my opinion. But if this is that
blows your hair back. Go with it!
-- 
Best regards,
____________________________
       Csaba Kiss
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
     tel:+4687286259
      fax:+468330498
____________________________


________________________________________________
Current version is 1.62r | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to