Hello, Friday, June 13, 2003, 6:49:12 PM, you wrote:
MA> <snip> >> The filtering system you presented, if I remember correctly, rejects >> all HTML email out of hand. This seems kinda draconian to me. I'll >> bet a lot of those rejections are false positives. POPFile actually >> reads the HTML and can correctly distinguish spam-HTML from >> non-spam-HTML. MA> To this author, e-mail is text; HTML belongs on the web; HTML in MA> e-mail is spam. No, it is not. There's no need to be paranoid about e-mails. MA> Read my lips: Not a thing draconian about that logic. Your rules are way too serious in my opinion. But if this is that blows your hair back. Go with it! -- Best regards, ____________________________ Csaba Kiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel:+4687286259 fax:+468330498 ____________________________ ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.62r | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html