On 10/21/2003, in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Rob said:

> you mean this :

> [+] GnuPG passphrase caching. The user now can select from various signing keys 
> available.

> well, caching does not work and i can not select signing keys ; i get a
> password prompt for the one that 'belongs' to the account ...

Yes, I meant that, but since I don't use GnuPG, I couldn't tell what
that meant. It seemed to address your remarks.

I stopped using PGP a long time ago because it was such a hassle to
use. When I looked at it again about a year ago, I looked at GnuPG (I
think) and OpenPGP, etc. They seemed to be just as much of a hassle as
before. But the latest version of PGP from www.pgp.com seems to be
much less so.

I am a big proponent of "no hassle" since I look at so much email
every day. This seems to be pretty well done. It stays out of my way,
except for the first time I enter my password; I have it cached for
about hours, so I really only enter it once an email session. And when
I want to check a signature or whatever, it contacts the PGP Key
server for me and gets the public key. I like that. "Automated" is good
for me. I never liked having to manually distribute my key. I don't
like having to ask for one before using it. I know some people will
think that caching a password for 2 hours is unsecure, but I don't use
this at my office, so it works just fine for me.  :)



-- 
Best regards,
 Jim D                 JD -at- CastleGK -dot- com
 [Using The Bat! 2.01.3 on Windows XP Service Pack 1 Build 2600]
---
A day without sunshine is like, you know, night. ~Steve Martin
---

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

________________________________________________
Current version is 2.01.3 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to