Rich Gregory, [RG] wrote: RG> EXACTLY! I was hoping to find a wrap setting that I would like MY RG> mail to come in as! This is why I also selected 70 characters. I RG> have no idea why under "windows compatable" it doesn't "listen" to RG> that setting.
As with most other editors that behave as the Windows compatible editor does, it only soft wraps. The wrapping you see as you type isn't really only visual. To confirm this, copy a few lines of text you type in that editor and paste it in notepad. Toggle off notepads wrapping and it appears as a single line of text. Do the same experiment with MicroEd and you'll see that text copied from it into notepad appears wrapped irrespective of notepads wrap setting. TB! was originally developed with one editor, i.e., MicroEd. As a result it never wrapped on sending. It never needed to. I guess with this new editor on board, something would need to be done, but at the moment, TB! still doesn't wrap on sending text. RG> I can't stand the way lines are full justified and all the keybopard RG> shortcut editing keys do not work in MicroEd. You can toggle off justification in the editor preferences. MicroEd's shortcuts are a little different from what you're accustomed to and a complete listing may be found on the FAQ pages. http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/shortcut.eng.txt RG> It is not at all a preference to ask anyone to try to read unwrapped RG> lines. I am still struggling with the transition to TB! from Eudora RG> that handles wrapping perfectly no matter how a message was created. Eudora wraps on sending. It doesn't wrap perfectly. :( This is why I've stayed away from it. -- -= allie_M =- | List Moderator PGPKeys: http://www.ac-martin.com/pgpkeys.html ____________________________________ Using TB! v2.01.26 on WinXP Pro (SP1)
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________ Current version is 2.01.3 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
