Hello Peter,

> You (or the RFC) are now forcing me to use a width which you may like,
> but I may not like.
> Hence, do not hard-wrap lines. Let the end-user decide what s/he
> likes. Ya, this means not being compliant to RFCs, create a new RFC,
> and let the end user decide how s/he wants to see it, depending on the
> user-agant setting like: wrap at xx, soft wrap at window width, as it
> has been created, ...something else..

<Irony ON>
I agree with you. We should even be able to decide on the content of the
messages we received. Why am I forced to read what you have typed if I
would like to read something else?
</Irony OFF>

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v2.01.3
Winamp OFF:


________________________________________________
Current version is 2.01.3 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to