Hello Peter, > You (or the RFC) are now forcing me to use a width which you may like, > but I may not like. > Hence, do not hard-wrap lines. Let the end-user decide what s/he > likes. Ya, this means not being compliant to RFCs, create a new RFC, > and let the end user decide how s/he wants to see it, depending on the > user-agant setting like: wrap at xx, soft wrap at window width, as it > has been created, ...something else..
<Irony ON> I agree with you. We should even be able to decide on the content of the messages we received. Why am I forced to read what you have typed if I would like to read something else? </Irony OFF> -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.01.3 Winamp OFF: ________________________________________________ Current version is 2.01.3 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html