Hello Robin, Tuesday, June 8, 2004, 9:47:14 AM, you wrote:
RA>>> And if you omit the %- after RA>>> %If:"%_SetLang"="PL":"%QInclude(new_PL)": RA>>> you will find you have one extra blank line in your Polish messages. >> With or without %- same result. The Polish messages behave like all >> the others... RA> Even after adding the "" (<action if false>) at the end of the %If RA> statements? I am a little surprised, but only a little. I tried again: You are right. After adding the "" (<action if false>) also the %- at the end of the last if statement behaves differently from before. (Why?) Without the %- a blank line appears between the part of the sig coming from the language slave and the part of the sig coming from the master. But: This is the case not only for Polish but for all languages. (You know what I mean, don't you (-: ) But maybe there is nothing to worry about since it works now... >> What does this mean for the SetLanguage QT? As far as I see there is >> also an empty <action if false> statement in the %If macros. >> Where is the <action if false> statement? RA> Good question. You say it works at the moment, and that probably reflects RA> the robustness of the macro's ability to parse the lines above. However RA> it would be better to make them read RA> %If:'%_SLDomain'='fr':'%_SetLang="FR"':''%- RA> %If:'%_SLDomain'='de':'%_SetLang="DE"':''%- RA> %If:'%_SLDomain'='sk':'%_SetLang="SK"':''%- RA> %If:'%_SLDomain'='cz':'%_SetLang="SK"':''%- RA> %If:'%_SLDomain'='ru':'%_SetLang="RU"':''%- RA> %If:'%_SLDomain'='hu':'%_SetLang="HU"':''%- RA> %If:'%_SLDomain'='pl':'%_SetLang="PL"':''#%- Done. Works fine. Aren't you proud of your student? He finds already the mistakes of his teacher... (-: Since the new message part of the solution works now, I will try to get it working for replies as well. The first tests do not look well. During the last two hours I crashed TB exactly nine times (got frozen and I had to kill it). There seems to be a conflict between different QT or a bug with the %LANGUAGE macro. I did not narrow down yet what might be the reason. I think I will start a new thread with this question. Thanx again. -- Best regards, Cyrille mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [ TB! 2.10.01, Windows ME 4.90 Build 3000, Pentium 233Mhz with 95MB ] ________________________________________________ Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html