Hello Robin,

Tuesday, June 8, 2004, 9:47:14 AM, you wrote:

RA>>> And if you omit the %- after
RA>>>    %If:"%_SetLang"="PL":"%QInclude(new_PL)":
RA>>> you will find you have one extra blank line in your Polish messages.
>> With or without %- same result. The Polish messages behave like all
>> the others...
RA> Even after adding the "" (<action if false>) at the end of the %If
RA> statements? I am a little surprised, but only a little.

I tried again: You are right. After adding the "" (<action if false>)
also the %- at the end of the last if statement behaves differently from before. (Why?)
Without the %- a blank line appears between the part of the sig
coming from the language slave and the part of the sig coming from the
master. But: This is the case not only for Polish but for all languages.
(You know what I mean, don't you (-: )
But maybe there is nothing to worry about since it works now...

>> What does this mean for the SetLanguage QT? As far as I see there is
>> also an empty <action if false> statement in the %If macros.
>> Where is the <action if false> statement?
RA> Good question. You say it works at the moment, and that probably reflects
RA> the robustness of the macro's ability to parse the lines above. However
RA> it would be better to make them read
RA> %If:'%_SLDomain'='fr':'%_SetLang="FR"':''%-
RA> %If:'%_SLDomain'='de':'%_SetLang="DE"':''%-
RA> %If:'%_SLDomain'='sk':'%_SetLang="SK"':''%-
RA> %If:'%_SLDomain'='cz':'%_SetLang="SK"':''%-
RA> %If:'%_SLDomain'='ru':'%_SetLang="RU"':''%-
RA> %If:'%_SLDomain'='hu':'%_SetLang="HU"':''%-
RA> %If:'%_SLDomain'='pl':'%_SetLang="PL"':''#%-

Done.
Works fine.
Aren't you proud of your student? He finds already the mistakes of his
teacher... (-:

Since the new message part of the solution works now, I will try to
get it working for replies as well.
The first tests do not look well. During the last two hours I crashed
TB exactly nine times (got frozen and I had to kill it). There seems
to be a conflict between different QT or a bug with the %LANGUAGE
macro. I did not narrow down yet what might be the reason.
I think I will start a new thread with this question.

Thanx again.

--
Best regards,
Cyrille
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[ TB! 2.10.01, Windows ME 4.90 Build 3000, Pentium 233Mhz with 95MB ]



________________________________________________
Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to