On Tuesday, August 22, 2006, at 10:49:04 AM, Kitty wrote: > I've been trying Antispamsniper and it seems to miss about half the > spam. I have it set to mark as spam if it has a score of 60. Should > I be setting this much lower? I'm not getting many false positives > but it is missing a lot.
I have mine set at 55. However it takes quite a bit of training. I'm still getting a few undetected, but the detection rate is rapidly increasing. At present I'm highlighting the whole Junk folder and clicking the "junk" button each time I check the mail, and also clicking "not junk" for each good message. It's important to let it know what is not junk, as well as what is junk... I also did register it, and am using the "bad words" feature that is only in the paid version to simplify the spam filtering. However my address appears on my web page since I have an on-line business and as a result get between 100 and 200 messages daily, most of which are spam... -- Jim Kyle mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ________________________________________________ Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
