Hello Roelof, My first post, identical to this never appeared, so I had resent this again. Thanks for responding point-wise. My advices are as under:
Friday, September 28, 2007, 5:43:20 AM, you wrote: > Hallo pkr, > On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 05:07:30 +0530GMT (28-9-2007, 1:37 +0200, where I > live), you wrote: PB>> First post, at times the incoming message triggers the voyager PB>> to for installation CD of Office 2003. Even after supplying the PB>> same, it goes into a loop. > That's odd. It's happening with Voyager, you say? Is it happening on > multiple computers or just on one system? It is happening on multiple computers. PB>> The error message is enclosed (bat_error.png). > You can't post attachments here, better upload it to website place the > link in your message, or select the error message and press Ctrl-C > when it happens, so you can paste it in a message. OK, as it is not material now, not posting now, will keep it in mind. PB>> If this particular message is somehow deleted it goes into PB>> Trash Folder, does not create any problem. If attempt is made to PB>> delete it from trash, the same problem is encountered. > What happens when you delete it from Trash by emptying the Trash > folder instead of opening the message? The moment the message is selected, even if the cursor placed on this message, it spins into the loop of asking for instal CD. Yes, emptying the Trash has deleted this mail. PB>> Otherwise no issues. The message which has this problem is often PB>> with attachment or even without attachment. > Do those messages have anything in common? The account they're > directed to, do the senders belong to the same address book group, are > they written with the same mail client? Like it happened today, it was a bounced mail "mailer daemon" with an attachment tag, email client used could not be checked so far. Will report it next time this occurs. PB>> Apparently from the error message it looks like a memory related PB>> problem. But it is happening very rarely, prompting me to think PB>> that its really not a memory problem. > When it happens, would you be busy with Office 2003 or a special part > of it? No. PB>> Can somebody please throw some light ? > Now that I think of it, did you install Outlook as a part of Office > 2003? Is some document type associated with Outlook? Yes, Outlook was installed but never used. For some mobile phone application (mobiledit, in particular), to have a backup , the outlook was configured. however it was never used. Next time will keep all these things in mind to note down and report. -- Best regards, pkr.bat mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ________________________________________________ Current version is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
