Hello MONSELL, On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 18:14:48 +0530 GMT (14/Aug/09, 19:44 PM +0700 GMT), mons...@monsell-international.com wrote:
Mmic> I got 3 email accounts (A, B & C). My filter folders are all set in the Mmic> COMMON FOLDER. The default email id is A account. When ever the Mmic> REPLY button is pressed for a message resting in the COMMON FOLDER it Mmic> opens up under A. But sometimes, the message has to be replied by B or Mmic> C account. I really wonder why you filter all messages into a common folder. If you want to reply seperately from the incoming account, there is absolutely no neccesity to mix all emails together. In fact, TB!'s ability to keep the accounts seperate was my main main reason to buy TB! some ten years ago. Mmic> There is this function IF, THEN and ELSE used in TB and using these Mmic> functions, is there a possibility for TB to recognized the email id's Mmic> that has to be replied under A, B and C account??? Sure there is, but it is much more convenient to keep the Inboxes seperately to begin with. In fact, the problem you does not exist in TB!; you created it. If you want to see all your incoming mails in one folder (I wouldn't know why, but people work differently), I suggest to use a virtual folder. Just let it monitor all the Inboxes of the different accounts and set the condition to Unread. Mmic> One could store all the email id's or even better, the domain name Mmic> that has to go under A and similarly to B & C or only to store for B & Mmic> C account so that once the REPLY button is hit, TB identifies under Mmic> which account that this message has to be replied. Sure. One could also export the messages, rotate with ROT-26 and then re-import. All is possible with TB!. But why oh why do you spend so much energy to make email handling inefficient? All these loops and hoops are really not necessary with TB!. Mmic> At moment, what I have done is made a QT so that if the REPLY has to Mmic> be done with B account, but opens with A account, I run the QT and the Mmic> FROM id changes from A to B. sometimes, it is overlooked and the REPLY Mmic> goes under A which actually it should have been under B. TB! is really great at that. Better solution (IMHO): Use TB! out of the box. That's much more efficient that way. -- Cheers, Thomas. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 4.2.9.4 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 ________________________________________________ Current version is 4.2.9.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
