On Apr 15, 2013, at 9:37 PM, Denis Ovsienko <infrastat...@yandex.ru> wrote:
> I tried closing a couple of issues, but ran into a question. Do existing tags > in GitHub issues (v3.5, v3.6, ... v4.3) mean "opened against version N.N" or > "fixed in version N.N"? Those were copied over from SourceForge; the intent, at least, of the tags was "opened against version N.N". I'm not sure whether they served/serve a useful purpose. > Should the tickets in SourceForge tracker be closed now? If there were an automated way to do so - with commenting closed, and a "further comments on the issue at http://github.org/the-tcpdump-group/..."; as the closing comment - that would make sense. I'm not sure anybody here wants to close 219 SourceForge comments by hand. :-) If you mean that when you close an issue by hand on GitHub, the corresponding SF issue should be closed by hand, that might not be a bad idea. (I did that for the tcpdump issue you closed on GitHub with "-W implements that".) _______________________________________________ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
