>> Should the tickets in SourceForge tracker be closed now?
>
> If there were an automated way to do so - with commenting closed, and a
> "further comments on the issue at http://github.org/the-tcpdump-group/..."; as
> the closing comment - that would make sense.
>
> I'm not sure anybody here wants to close 219 SourceForge comments by hand. :-)
Give me 2-4 weeks and permission for SF account "infrastation" and I will take
care of that.
>
> If you mean that when you close an issue by hand on GitHub, the corresponding
> SF issue should be closed by hand, that might not be a bad idea. (I did that
> for the tcpdump issue you closed on GitHub with "-W implements that".)
Let's focus on having only one bug tracker, but a well-ordered one.
--
Denis Ovsienko
_______________________________________________
tcpdump-workers mailing list
tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org
https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
