> I.e., any option-based solution might not work through a middlebox - > including the one that signals the use of TCPINC. At that point, we're > back to running TLS, and it seems pointless to discuss this as a TCP > variant, IMO.
I agree with Joe. Can we list the attacks that would not be prevented by TLS, but that would be prevented by a version of TCPINC that does not protect the TCP header? -- Christian Huitema _______________________________________________ Tcpinc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
