On 3/18/15, 7:03 AM, "Stephen Kent" <[email protected]> wrote:

>I prefer a TLS-based solution, principally because of the
>extensive experience understanding the security aspects of
>TLS, and because of the code reuse opportunity.

TLS is poorly documented and implemented:
        https://www.smacktls.com/smack.pdf

Whatever new mechanisms are created, the more
they stand on their own the better.

Paul

>
>I am willing to review and comment on future versions of docs
>addressing the tcpinc requirements as now stated.
>
>Steve
>
>_______________________________________________
>Tcpinc mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc

_______________________________________________
Tcpinc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc

Reply via email to