On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Scharf, Michael (Michael) <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > TCPM has scheduled a discussion of draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-edo in the upcoming > meeting [1]. At this stage, TCPM is really interested in feedback from > implementers and potential users, e.g., regarding feature gaps or deployment > problems.
Which (experimental) TCP feature requires EDO? Does tcpcrypt require EDO? Same question applies to proposals extending option space in SYN. > > > In a previous discussion, TCPINC was identified as one potential user of EDO > [2]. I understand that the TCPINC design is still at a early stage. Still, if > there are thoughts on EDO in the TCPINC community, please feel free to share > them on the TCPM list, or please talk us in the next TCPM meeting. > > Thanks > > Michael (TCPM co-chair) > > > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/92/agenda/tcpm/ > > [2] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpinc/current/msg00429.html > > _______________________________________________ > Tcpinc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc _______________________________________________ Tcpinc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
