On 3/23/2015 1:45 PM, Yuchung Cheng wrote: > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Joe Touch <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> On 3/23/2015 11:28 AM, Yuchung Cheng wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Scharf, Michael (Michael) >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> TCPM has scheduled a discussion of draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-edo in the upcoming >>>> meeting [1]. At this stage, TCPM is really interested in feedback from >>>> implementers and potential users, e.g., regarding feature gaps or >>>> deployment problems. >>> >>> Which (experimental) TCP feature requires EDO? Does tcpcrypt require EDO? >>> >>> Same question applies to proposals extending option space in SYN. >> >> The answer to both questions in the motivation section of the drafts. >> >> Joe > Where?
EDO: Section 6: Some combinations of the above options may not fit in the existing SYN option space, and (as noted) that space cannot be extended. --- EDO-SYN: 1. Introduction This extension is required to support some combinations of TCP options, notably large ones such as TCP AO [RFC5925], Multipath TCP [RFC6824], and TCP Fast Open [Ch14] with other options already typically used in most TCP connections. --- _______________________________________________ Tcpinc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
