On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Yuchung Cheng <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Scharf, Michael (Michael) > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > TCPM has scheduled a discussion of draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-edo in the > upcoming meeting [1]. At this stage, TCPM is really interested in feedback > from implementers and potential users, e.g., regarding feature gaps or > deployment problems. > > Which (experimental) TCP feature requires EDO? Does tcpcrypt require EDO? > Well, SACK? But, I guess common cases will be a combination of extensions, not a specific one. -- Yoshi > Same question applies to proposals extending option space in SYN. > > > > > > > In a previous discussion, TCPINC was identified as one potential user of > EDO [2]. I understand that the TCPINC design is still at a early stage. > Still, if there are thoughts on EDO in the TCPINC community, please feel > free to share them on the TCPM list, or please talk us in the next TCPM > meeting. > > > > Thanks > > > > Michael (TCPM co-chair) > > > > > > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/92/agenda/tcpm/ > > > > [2] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpinc/current/msg00429.html > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Tcpinc mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc > > _______________________________________________ > tcpm mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm >
_______________________________________________ Tcpinc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
