(with no hats) On 29/02/16 16:30, Black, David wrote: > > A final WG decision on how to proceed should be made in the next few > weeks, so comments on the list are welcome.
I think that plan sounds good. I'm happy to see tcpinc make progress without taking cycles away from TLS1.3. (Ok, that last bit did involve a bit of a hat:-) S.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Tcpinc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
