> Black, David wrote:
> While the TLS WG is hard at work on TLS 1.3, that protocol is not finished
> yet; the chairs believe that completion of that base protocol is a necessary
> prerequisite for a TCPINC profile of TLS 1.3 (e.g., as a TCPINC profile will
> have to normatively reference the TLS 1.3 specification). In addition,
> from a broader IETF perspective, completion of TLS 1.3 really does need
> to be the first priority for TLS experts such as Eric Rescorla.
Sorry if this has been asked (I didn't see it), but is this merely a
person-cycles issue or is there some deeper reason for not designing it
agnostic to 1.2 vs. 1.3 and requiring 1.2 support until 1.3 is ready?
Joe
_______________________________________________
Tcpinc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
