Thanks - that's much more specific than the original posted reason. Joe
On 3/3/2016 12:51 AM, Mirja Kühlewind wrote: > Hi Joe, > > yes, the 0-RTT handshake in TLS1.3 is the part that is most important for us > and a requirement for tcpinc. Further there is no need for us to be backward > compatible, as there are currently no tcpinc implementation that support a > lower version. So that limits (implementation) complexity. > > Mirja > > > >> Am 01.03.2016 um 21:00 schrieb Black, David <[email protected]>: >> >> Hmm ... I might suggest consulting the TLS 1.3 draft's version history: >> >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tls-tls13-11#section-1.2 >> >> There are significant changes to the initial handshake from TLS 1.2, and >> that initial handshake is the primary focus of the tcpinc profile of TLS. >> >> Thanks, --David >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Tcpinc [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joe Touch >>> Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 7:31 PM >>> To: Derek Fawcus; tcpinc ([email protected]) >>> Cc: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [tcpinc] TCPINC - security protocols >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> Black, David wrote: >>>> While the TLS WG is hard at work on TLS 1.3, that protocol is not finished >>>> yet; the chairs believe that completion of that base protocol is a >>>> necessary >>>> prerequisite for a TCPINC profile of TLS 1.3 (e.g., as a TCPINC profile >>>> will >>>> have to normatively reference the TLS 1.3 specification). In addition, >>>> from a broader IETF perspective, completion of TLS 1.3 really does need >>>> to be the first priority for TLS experts such as Eric Rescorla. >>> >>> Sorry if this has been asked (I didn't see it), but is this merely a >>> person-cycles issue or is there some deeper reason for not designing it >>> agnostic to 1.2 vs. 1.3 and requiring 1.2 support until 1.3 is ready? >>> >>> Joe >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Tcpinc mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tcpinc mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc > _______________________________________________ Tcpinc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
